We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents of your boy or Female will not approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they can do if they are able to Lower off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by legislation.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Given that the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become arrived at, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support with the Supreme Court, making sure the enforcement of its judgments. As being the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become attained, the decision on the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. Read more
In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there might exist conflicts between the assorted reduced appellate courts. Sometimes these differences might not be 489 f case laws resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, Additionally it is a properly-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
500,000/- (Rupees Five hundred thousand only) Each and every along with the same shall be held in the police station on the effect that no harm shall be caused towards the petitioners. 5. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. If the appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 days with the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we're guided via the decision in the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
ten. Based around the findings on the inquiry committee, this petition is not really viewed as maintainable and is also therefore liable to become dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent as well as the case under appeal, perhaps overruling the previous case regulation by setting a fresh precedent of higher authority. This may happen several times as the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first with the High Court of Justice, later of your Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his advancement of the concept of estoppel starting while in the High Trees case.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory regulation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are established by executive businesses based on statutes.